GROUP TWO:
In “Moments of Choice,” V.F. Perkins distinguishes between filmmakers who achieve “manner” and those who successfully turn manner into “style.” As he explains this transition, a successful director can “[…] bind the movie together in a design that offers a more personal and detailed conception of the story’s significance, embodying an experience of the world and a viewpoint both considered and felt. At this point, manner becomes style.” For Perkins, films that are mainly concerned with manner (i.e., the way a story is told) lack the “style” associated with using elements of mise-en-scène to enhance the narrative structure.
As discussed in class, several critics complained that Memento’s (2007) syuzhet was nothing more than an “author’s trick.” They asserted that the narrative structure, while original and compelling, lacked support from a captivating story line or elements of mise-en-scène to further the visual themes of the film. Shark in the Head (2004) reverses the emphasis from narrative construction to stylistic representation – almost to a dangerous polar opposite. This film emphasizes stylistic expression over narrative.
For this assignment, you will write TWO PARAGRAPHS:
Choose one moment from Shark in the Head in which setting plays a prominent role. ***DESCRIBE IT, in detail, TO YOUR READER*** What is the setting? How does the director deviate from traditional depictions of setting to create symbolism? As an element of mise-en-scène, does this moment contribute to the visual themes of the film?
After you have described the moment you chose, answer this question: does this film achieve style, or does it’s extreme concentration on stylistic representation mean that it is a film of “manner” (i.e., is the film more concerned with HOW it is telling the story than the elements that contribute to a complete cinematic experience)?
REQUIREMENTS: 300 words minimum. You must use at least 3 vocabulary words from the first 25 words on the list. BOLD each vocabulary word you use. Post must be live by 3:00 pm on Friday, February 4, 2011.
GROUP ONE:
After group two has posted their entries, browse through your peers' blogs and pick one entry to comment upon. You can agree with the writer, argue with a specific point made, or both. But, you MUST add something to the conversation begun by the writer.
REQUIREMENTS: 300 words minimum. Post must be live by 3:00 pm on Saturday, February 5, 2011.