
ENG2300 Film Analysis Class Blog
Site Description
Wednesday, April 6, 2011
"Pitch a Movie Idea" Contest: Tonight

Blog Assignment 5/6: Experimental Films and The Spectator Experience
"Site Specific: Las Vegas 05" (Olivo Barbieri, 2006)
In our textbook, Scott MacDonald is quoted as saying that avant-garde films may evoke frustration because, “these films confront us with the necessity of redefining an experience we were sure we understood” (Pramaggiore, 293). Referring to the spectator experience, MacDonald suggests that viewers encounter avant-garde and experimental films differently than traditional commercial films. The difference can be attributed to two factors: (1) the viewing space and (2) the visual/auditory material.
For the majority of this semester, we have re-created the traditional viewing experience: sitting in a darkened room, watching images projected on a large screen, listening and watching intently as a narrative unfolds before our eyes. But, as we discussed at the beginning of the semester, film viewing did not start out this way…spectators originally confronted short films in tents on fairgrounds or in storefront shops. Today, avant-garde and experimental films are most commonly encountered in museums, smaller theaters at film festivals, and on the Internet.
The way such films are seen, however, is not the only thing that challenges established notions of what watching film entails. Avant-garde film style asks us to re-think what film art encompasses through modifications of sound and image collision, non-narrative structure, philosophical and political subject matter, and visual expression.
For this Blog Assignment you will write two paragraphs: one discussing an avant-garde film screened in class and another thinking through contemporary notions of the spectator experience.
First, write a paragraph analyzing one of the short avant-garde films we screened in class (see handout for a complete list and links to each short). Answer this question:
How did this film make me re-think film art and/or the spectator experience?
In your second paragraph, respond to one of the following questions:
1. Today many spectators view films on computers or television sets, which is inherently different from viewing a movie on a big screen in a darkened room or theater. Have new movie-viewing practices changed the way we think about the cinema?
2. YouTube has made both avant-garde films and home-made video experiments available to a large viewing public. Does the YouTube Generation think about experimental videos differently than previous generations (who could only see such films in “art” environments)?
3. When YouTube videos and experimental shorts “go viral,” they receive public attention that rivals that of cult film publicity. Discuss one experience you have had in which you encountered a viral short video online. Do you think of such videos as “film” or categorize them as something else? Explain your answer.
REQUIREMENTS: 300 words minimum. Post must be live by 5:00 pm on Friday, April 8, 2011.
Tuesday, March 1, 2011
Blog Assignment #4: Writing with Style

Wednesday, February 16, 2011
Blog Assignment #3: Film Criticism Today -- A Single Man

GROUP TWO:
After group one has posted their entries, browse through your peers' blogs and pick one entry to comment upon. You can agree with the writer, argue with a specific point made, or both. But, you MUST add something to the conversation begun by the writer.
REQUIREMENTS: 200 words minimum. Post must be live by midnight on Saturday, February 19, 2011.
Tuesday, February 1, 2011
Blog Assignment #2: Moments of Choice in Shark in the Head
GROUP TWO:
In “Moments of Choice,” V.F. Perkins distinguishes between filmmakers who achieve “manner” and those who successfully turn manner into “style.” As he explains this transition, a successful director can “[…] bind the movie together in a design that offers a more personal and detailed conception of the story’s significance, embodying an experience of the world and a viewpoint both considered and felt. At this point, manner becomes style.” For Perkins, films that are mainly concerned with manner (i.e., the way a story is told) lack the “style” associated with using elements of mise-en-scène to enhance the narrative structure.
As discussed in class, several critics complained that Memento’s (2007) syuzhet was nothing more than an “author’s trick.” They asserted that the narrative structure, while original and compelling, lacked support from a captivating story line or elements of mise-en-scène to further the visual themes of the film. Shark in the Head (2004) reverses the emphasis from narrative construction to stylistic representation – almost to a dangerous polar opposite. This film emphasizes stylistic expression over narrative.
For this assignment, you will write TWO PARAGRAPHS:
Choose one moment from Shark in the Head in which setting plays a prominent role. ***DESCRIBE IT, in detail, TO YOUR READER*** What is the setting? How does the director deviate from traditional depictions of setting to create symbolism? As an element of mise-en-scène, does this moment contribute to the visual themes of the film?
After you have described the moment you chose, answer this question: does this film achieve style, or does it’s extreme concentration on stylistic representation mean that it is a film of “manner” (i.e., is the film more concerned with HOW it is telling the story than the elements that contribute to a complete cinematic experience)?
REQUIREMENTS: 300 words minimum. You must use at least 3 vocabulary words from the first 25 words on the list. BOLD each vocabulary word you use. Post must be live by 3:00 pm on Friday, February 4, 2011.
GROUP ONE:
After group two has posted their entries, browse through your peers' blogs and pick one entry to comment upon. You can agree with the writer, argue with a specific point made, or both. But, you MUST add something to the conversation begun by the writer.
REQUIREMENTS: 300 words minimum. Post must be live by 3:00 pm on Saturday, February 5, 2011.
Wednesday, January 19, 2011
Blog Assignment #1: Enigma and Delay in Psycho
GROUP ONE:
For this assignment, we will be working from Roland Barthes’ notion of the “writerly” text. According to Barthes, “…the writerly text is ourselves writing” (S/Z, 5); therefore, you, the reader, will be interpreting the film text in order to produce meaning from it.
Your assignment is to analyze Hitchcock's storytelling strategy in Psycho by connecting your observations to Barthes' Hermeneutic Code. The Hermeneutic Code denotes an enigma (riddle) that moves the narrative foreward, setting up delays and obstacles that maintain suspense. You need to produce TWO PARAGRAPHS:
Paragraph 1: Identify an Enigma established in the film, Psycho. How is the question posed visually to you, the viewer? Then, discuss ONE SCENE in which a delay is introduced. How is the delay represented visually and what is the effect of creating this delay?
DELAYS:
1. Thematisation. What in the narrative is an enigma?
2. Positioning. Additional confirmations of the enigma.
3. Formulation of the enigma.
4. Promise of an answer of the enigma.
5. Fraud. Circumvention of the true answer.
6. Equivocation. Mixture of fraud and truth.
7. Blocking. The enigma cannot be solved.
8. Suspended answer. Stopping the answering after having begun.
9. Partial answer. Some facets of the truth are revealed.
10. Disclosure of the truth.
Since we are dealing with a film, the code can take the form of spoken dialogue, auditory cues or music, visuals, and/or editing choices. Remember, Barthes says that “Each literary description is a view” (55). He describes the writer (read: artist of any kind) as someone who places a frame around reality, creating a perspective from which we see the story being told. Every decision the artist makes creates a frame. Decisions to include or exclude details, to frame characters in a particular way, or to place actions within a specific chronology all affect the way we interpret the scene.
Paragraph 2: In your opinion, could this film be classified as a readerly text or does it allow for plurality of meanings, making it a writerly text?
REQUIREMENTS: 300 words minimum. You must use at least 2 vocabulary words from the first 12 words on the list. BOLD each vocabulary word you use. Post must be live by 3:00 pm on Friday, January 21, 2011.
GROUP TWO:
After group one has posted their entries, browse through your peers' blogs and pick one entry to comment upon. You can agree with the writer, argue with a specific point made, or both. But, you MUST add something to the conversation begun by the writer.
REQUIREMENTS: 300 words minimum. Post must be live by 3:00 pm on Saturday, January 22, 2011.